1/10/2024 0 Comments Packrat scores![]() Conclusions: The scores obtained by the students on the PACKRAT examination correlated well with those obtained on the first administration of the PANCE. A PACKRAT score of < 55% (raw score = 124) had a sensitivity of 77.2% and specificity of 83.3%. ![]() ![]() Logistic regression showed a significant relationship between PACKRAT scores and PANCE performance (P<0.001). Results: Correlation between PACKRAT and PANCE scores showed a correlation coefficient of 0.668 (P<0.001). Analysis of the predictive value of PACKRAT results with respect to passing the PANCE was accomplished using logistic regression. The relationship between the scores was evaluated by determination of the correlation coefficient. This represents students included in seven different classes (n = 375). The first didactic year is divided into three separate trimesters and a new class of students begins each four months. The study included those students that began their training in May of 1999 through May 2001. The PANCE scores represent the first attempt by IPAP graduates to attain certification shortly following completion of their second phase of training (clinical rotations). The PACKRAT examination was administered to students within the last few weeks of their first year of training, just prior to beginning their clinical rotations. Methods: PACKRAT scores from students enrolled in the Interservice Physician Assistant Program (IPAP) following their didactic year of training were compared to the PANCE scores by the same students. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between student scores on the Physician Assistant Clinical Knowledge Rating and Assessment Tool (PACKRAT) and performance on the Physician Assistant National Certifying Examination (PANCE).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |